FIRST DEARBORN, NOW TORONTO

I just saw this post by Debbie Schlussel and our loss of freedom continues in the name of appeasing the Muslims. After all, we have to be VERY sure we are sensitive to their religious beliefs and customs, but it's OK to offend and publicly ridicule Christans.  Here is her POST:

August 4, 2011, - 6:15 pm

It’s Over: Toronto Police Help Muslim Mob Punch Man w/ Camera

By Debbie Schlussel

This is in Canada, but if you think it can’t, won’t, or hasn’t already happened here in the U.S., you need to get your head out of the sand.  Apparently, you cannot take pictures in a public place anymore .  .  . when Muslims are involved.  Yup, when Muslims are involved, all democracy, all freedoms, all rights go out the window . . . because, hey, we might offend them.

David Menzies Assaulted By Muslims Who Are Defended by Dhimmi Toronto Cops

David Menzies, a Toronto freelance writer, writes this excellent and frightening Toronto Sun column about how a Muslim woman in a hijab punched him for daring to take a photo (and not of her).  The nerve of him. But it gets worse. The dhimmi Toronto Police defend the Muslim woman for punching him and trying to destroy his camera. Oh, and the Arab Muslim mob acts like they are in Saudi Arabia’s “Chop Chop Square” and it’s jihad time.

What constitutes a physical assault in Toronto these days? . . . I learned firsthand on Sunday, a fist in the face doesn’t necessarily constitute assault in our increasingly culturally sensitive Toronto.

The details: I was at Yonge-Dundas Square with my nine-year-old son. We ate pizza. We drank bubble tea. And I used my new Canon camera to take photos of this neon shrine.

Suddenly, a woman wearing a hijab ran toward me. She was part of a group that included two women wearing full face-covering burkas. She was screaming: “We are Muslim! You do not take pictures of us!” (Odd. I can’t find the “no photos” rule in the Qur’an.)

I informed the lady I was in a public square in a democracy. I can actually take pictures of whomever I please.

And then: Ka-pow! Her fist collided with my face. Worse, she almost knocked my new camera from my hands.

My son and I were then surrounded by a mob of about 20 people, many of whom were speaking Arabic. One kept demanding I surrender my camera to him.

It was surreal. Was I in Toronto — or Riyadh?

It could be Dearbornistan or Minneapolis.

I spotted a group of bicycle-mounted police officers. I burst through the mob with my son and made a beeline towards them. I told a Toronto Police officer what had happened and I wanted to press assault charges.

Better yet, a man and a woman came forward as eyewitnesses.

The 50-something couple, originally from Syria, told the police they had observed the entire affair and my allegations were true. The couple said they understood Arabic and knew what the mob was saying.

Alas, my Spidey Senses started to tingle when I overheard the questions being asked of the witnesses. “Was it a closed-fist punch or an open hand? Was it the front or the back of the hand?”

Huh? Physical contact had been made. Why did severity matter?

After the officer took my statement, he went over to the offending woman. Another constable was inexplicably miffed I was (legally) taking photos in the first place. The irony: Just above our heads a Toronto Police Service sphere was videotaping the activities.

The officer interrogated the woman. She was still hysterical. Good. The constable would encounter firsthand what I had been forced to deal with earlier.

The cop walked back to me. No charges would be laid, he said, because he believed the woman’s story — namely, she was merely trying to knock the camera out of my hands.

Got that? Apparently, attempted property damage is OK. If a face gets in the way of a would-be vandalizing fist… hey, accidents happen.

The Syrian eyewitnesses were speechless. I continued to plead my case.

Toronto Police cruisers are emblazoned with the slogan, “To serve and protect”. But increasingly, the unofficial slogan seems closer to, “F.I.D.O.” (“Forget It; Drive On.”)

The fact we have Islamists living amongst us who despise western values isn’t news. But surely you can’t just sock someone in the mouth.

Well, apparently you can — as long as the intent of the aggressor was merely to inflict property damage.

Happy Ramadan, everyone! And say good-bye, North America. I used to say we were 10 or 20 years behind Europe when it comes to collapsing under the weight of Islam and Muslims.

But we’re getting there faster than that. Time to get fitted for a keffiyeh.

This is yet one more fine example of the "religion of peace" that is enjoying more and more privileges the rest of free society does not enjoy.  Can you imagine what it would have been like if a Christian had done this very same thing in the name of his/her religious beliefs?  There wouldn't have been the excuse-making or glossing over and making assault OK.  That Christian would have been under the jail.  Laws seem to increasingly not apply to Muslims.

Those who think they are "tolerant" will have the same loss of rights and be subjected to the same treatment.  This is something the liberal left doesn't understand.  There is no tolerance for liberalism or any other ideology under Muslim rule, only Islam.

CHRISTIANS NOW HAVE NO FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS . . .

. . . at least in Dearborn, Michigan.  Here is a well written post from the blog ANSWERING MUSLIMS.  For background on this, see my post, THE TRAMPLING OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.  Here's the story:

Sharia Judge Michael J. Callahan Nullifies the Fourth Amendment Rights of Christians in Michigan

Michigan's war against the Constitutional rights of Christians has reached its peak.

In every state in this country, with one exception, a police officer cannot seize a person or her property without probable cause (a reasonable belief that a person has committed a crime).

Today, Judge Michael J. Callahan ruled that the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution does not apply to Christians in the state of Michigan. If a Christian visits Michigan, she may be detained, seized, arrested, and thrown in jail based on no evidence whatsoever.

At last year's Arab Festival in Dearborn, Corporal Brian Kapanowski approached Negeen Mayel and ordered her to turn off her video camera. Since Negeen hadn't been accused of committing any crime, she was under no legal obligation to obey his order (and, let's face it, he was only ordering her to stop filming so she wouldn't catch our unlawful arrests on tape). When Negeen didn't immediately turn off her camera, and instead asked why she was being questioned, Corporal Kapanowski grabbed her, seized her camera (which police then kept for more than three weeks), dragged her out of the tent, arrested her, threw her in jail, and charged her with two crimes.

Obviously, in any court that honors the Constitutional rights of citizens, Kapanowski would be in trouble. It turns out, however, that Dearborn courts have as much contempt for the Constitution as Dearborn police. Before the trial even began, Dearborn Judge Mark Somers ruled that Corporal Kapanowski had probable cause to arrest Negeen, even though she hadn't been accused of any criminal activity.

Do not miss the implications of this ruling. According to Judge Somers, in the City of Dearborn, police have probable cause to arrest Christians, even if the Christians haven't been accused of a crime. This means that any Dearborn police officer may arrest any Christian, simply because he feels like it.

Since we realized we weren't going to get justice in Dearborn, we were hopeful that the appeals court would have more respect for our fundamental rights as American citizens. Our hopes were dashed today when Judge Callahan ruled that police may indeed arrest a Christian who hasn't been accused of a crime.

Amazingly, people act like we're crazy when we say that Dearborn is being influenced by Sharia. But the facts speak for themselves. Christians are rapidly becoming second-class citizens in Michigan, and anyone who speaks up is quickly labeled an "Islamophobe." The saddest part of this is that non-Muslims are the ones who are doing the difficult work of destroying the Constitution. Mayor John O'Reilly, City Prosecutors William "Sharia Bill" DeBiasi and Debra Walling, Corporal Kapanowski, Sergeant Mrowka, Chief Haddad, Judge Somers, and now Judge Callahan are all trying desperately to undermine the U.S. Constitution.

And practically no one seems to care.

Many Dearborn residents are offended when people say that Sharia is taking hold in their city. But until the City of Dearborn starts showing some degree of respect for the rights of non-Muslims, until Christians are free to discuss their faith without being arrested, until the Fourth Amendment actually protects teenage girls from illegal search and seizure, the accusations are going to continue.

For a complete summary of the events in Dearborn, with video footage, click here.

(NOTE: I have referred to the "Constitutional rights of Christians." Since certain readers love to misrepresent and distort what I say, let me go ahead and state clearly that I do not believe, never have believed, and never will believe that only Christians should have Constitutional rights. All U.S. citizens, regardless of race or religion, are protected by the Constitution. Indeed, I would be just as opposed to police violating the civil rights of a Muslim or an atheist as I would a Christian. But in this case, it's the rights of Christians that are being violated, so that's the topic of the post.)

GLOBAL JIHAD

I received this from the JEWISH INTERNET DEFENSE FORCE.  This video gives the truth about the Islamic goal of world domination and world rule.  Islamic terrorism and aggression has nothing to do with U.S. foreign policy, Israeli foreign policy, or anyone else's.  This has been going on far longer.  As you watch this, keep in mind the examples cited here are just the tip of the iceberg.  There are far more instances than could possibly be depicted in many videos.

MUSLIMS SUPPORTING OVERTHROW OF EGYPTIAN GOVERNMENT

Not surprisingly, the outlawed group MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD is very actively participating in the riots that threaten to overthrow the Egyptian government according to Fox News correspondent, Greg Palkot who has been broadcasting live from Cairo.  There are no communications in Egypt other than the news networks sending reports and video by satellite.  The Internet has been shut off by the Egyptian government.  All TV stations are off the air.  All cellular telephone communications are out.  Land line telephones are out due to system overload.  So how did the word get out for the Egyptian people to take to the streets?  It was through the mosques and the Muslim Brotherhood.  Click HERE for the video.  

I found the Muslim Brotherhood's website and made a screenshot of the opening page showing their support for the overthrow of the Egyptian government and the idea the U.S. should support the protestors, referring to killed protestors as martyrs, and a direct quote: "Let the freedom rings! Egyptians begining to take control of their country."  Right under that on the screenshot is a very interesting blurb:  "Obama EXPOSED! American lies about freedom and democracy collapsed at the heels of the Egyptians."

It seems the Muslim Brotherhood isn't an Obama supporter, despite Obama's open support of Islamic rulers and his promise to never go to war with Islam.  Well, Mr. President, I have a bit of news for you.  As can be seen here, the feeling is NOT mutual.  You may not be at war with them, but they ARE at war with YOU!

"MB confirms it's not leading the demonstrations, only participating as part of Egyptian people."  Yeah, right, we certainly believe that one.  Wonder exactly with whom they "confirmed" that?  No way to look into it as all the links on their web page just keep displaying the page with their "news" blurbs.

The Islamic agenda has not changed in hundreds of years.  World domination under Islamic rule and Sharia Law is, has been, and will always be the goal.  If the Egyptian government falls, an Islamic government will be installed with most likely MOHAMED ELBARADEI as president. ElBaradei is touted as pro-democracy, but he is being supported by the Muslim Brotherhood.  Since when has anything about Islamic rule and Sharia Law ever been democratic?   

If President Mubarek is ousted, then be sure there will be a war waged against Israel. ElBaradei was part of the team that negotiated the peace treaty between Israel and Egypt in 1987, but when an Islamic government comes in, the "president" has little power and answers to Islamic religious leaders.  Look at Iran for an example.  If Egypt wars against Israel, that will be when the Obama administration will have a decision to make: support the Islamic government or support Israel.  There's little doubt which way this administration would go on that one. 

ISLAM UNJUST? JUST A MATTER OF PERCEPTION

That's what President Obama said in his now infamous speech. The problem is us. We're the problem - we're at fault - for viewing the Islamic religion as anything but peaceful. Yeah, it's all our fault, once again.

I've posted below both parts to President Obama's speech given at the University of Cairo in Cairo, Egypt. I will only comment on a few portions of it, as it is too lengthy to get into it all. To see a transcript of the speech, click HERE.

"The relationship between Islam and the West includes centuries of coexistence and co-operation, but also conflict and religious wars. More recently, tension has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims, and a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were too often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations. Moreover, the sweeping change brought by modernity and globalisation led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to the traditions of Islam. "

Here, the President once again is running America down, blaming the United States for Islamic terrorism. The U.S. is the country that has modernized a lot of the world. And, the last statement in this paragraph has absolutely nothing to do with the West being "hostile to the traditions of Islam." The Koran itself calls for the death of infidels, i. e. anyone who is not a Muslim. Mohammed was a man of conquest. Mohammed himself led twenty-seven military campaigns against innocent populations and planned thirty-eight others. And what's more, and Mohammed once said, "I am the prophet that laughs when killing my enemies." (Bibleprobe.com; Unveiling Islam). It's hardly our fault the Islamic nations don't like us. They hate us because they view the United States the same way they view Israel: as Zionists.

"Violent extremists have exploited these tensions in a small but potent minority of Muslims. The attacks of September 11th, 2001 and the continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has led some in my country to view Islam as inevitably hostile not only to America and Western countries, but also to human rights. This has bred more fear and mistrust."

"Has led SOME in my country to view Islam as inevitably hostile not only to America and Western countries, but also to human rights?" We know who Obama was speaking of here. He was slamming those "right wing extremists", you know, those who believe, uh, KNOW that Islam IS hostile to ANY nation and ANY ONE that is not a Muslim? And that Sharia law isn't about human rights at all? One example: women. Under Sharia law, the Islamic justice system, a woman accused of sexual misconduct is stoned to death. Sharia law prescribes just as harsh punishments for many other "crimes". It isn't about perception - human rights violations are a known fact.

"So long as our relationship is defined by our differences, we will empower those who sow hatred rather than peace, and who promote conflict rather than the co-operation that can help all of our people achieve justice and prosperity. This cycle of suspicion and discord must end."

"Those who sow hatred rather than peace" are the Islamic nations such as Iran. THEY promote conflict. Justice? The Islamic religion isn't about justice. The book I linked to above will tell it better than I can. It's well worth getting and reading.

(The book is a clickable link to the author's website).



"In Ankara, I made clear that America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam."

Islam is at war with us. If there is any doubt in your mind still, I will repost a video from one of my previous posts. But first, one quote from the video: "Allah stated in the Koran that the hostility between us and (the Jews) is eternal. So whoever talks about dialogue, cut off his tongue! What dialogue are they talking about? There is no room for dialogue. Allah said the hostility toward the Jews is eternal and along comes someone who talks about brotherhood and so on. This contradicts the Koran. Anyone who contradicts the Koran is an infidel." And just for clarification, the Islamics do not see any difference between us and the Jews. Here's the video:




President Obama will get nowhere trying to talk to nations like Iran. They have only one objective and that is to eliminate Zionism and world domination under Islamic rule. They do not negotiate. How many times do we have to learn this lesson over and over again?