Showing posts with label Media bias. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Media bias. Show all posts

14 August 2010

MEDIA BLINDNESS

Ever notice when a non-Democrat politician is accused of wrong-doing, his or her party affiliation is always included, but when it's a Democrat, it's mostly omitted? Listen closer to the television news and give a closer look at newspaper articles. A Democrat's party affiliation is left out more times than not.




In the greatest party-affiliation cover-up since the media tried to portray Gary Condit as a Republican, the media are refusing to mention the party affiliation of the thieving government officials in Bell, Calif.

There have been hundreds of news stories about Bell city officials' jaw-dropping salaries. In this poor city on the outskirts of Los Angeles, where the per capita annual income is $24,800 a year, the city manager, Robert Rizzo, had a salary of $787,637.

That's about twice what the president of the United States makes. (To be fair, Rizzo was doing a better job.)



Rizzo was the highest-paid government employee in the entire country, not counting Maxine Waters' husband -- pending further revelations. With benefits, his total annual compensation, according to the Los Angeles Times, came to $1.5 million a year.

Alerted to the Bell situation, the White House quickly added the Bell city manager to the list of jobs saved by its stimulus plan.

Not only that, but Rizzo was entitled to 28 weeks off a year for vacation and sick leave. To put that in perspective, that's almost as much vacation time as public school teachers get!

Reached in Spain, even Michelle Obama was outraged.

Rizzo responded to the anger over his preposterous salary by saying: "If that's a number people choke on, maybe I'm in the wrong business. I could go into private business and make that money."

(If he wants to grab one of those private-sector jobs that pays $1.5 million for 24 weeks of work, may I suggest the entertainment industry?)

Good luck to him. After leaving Bell, Rizzo will be lucky to land a job at Taco Bell. Before being anointed the King Tut of Bell, Rizzo was the city manager of Hesperia, Calif., where he was overpaid only to the tune of $78,000 a year.

The police chief, Randy Adams, was making $457,000 -- $770,046 including benefits. The assistant city manager, Angela Spaccia, had a $376,288 salary, with a total compensation package of $845,960. Being just an assistant city manager, Angela had to pay for her own yacht.

After the Los Angeles Times reported the stratospheric government salaries in little Bell, and the people of the town revolted, the millionaire government employees all resigned.

That'll show 'em! Oops, except upon their resignations, they qualified for lifetime pensions worth, by some estimates, more than $50 million.

These insane salary packages were granted by the mayor and four city council members -- who also set their own salaries. As a result, all but one was making $100,000 a year for these part-time jobs. After the council members' salaries came to light, the four looters cut their salaries by 90 percent.

According to Nexis, there have been more than 300 news stories reporting on the Bell scandal. Guess how many mentioned the party affiliation of the corrupt government bureaucrats?

One. Yes, just one. Now guess if the government officials were Democrats or Republicans? Yes, that is correct.

Congratulations -- you've qualified for our bonus round!

The one newspaper to cough up party affiliations, The Orange County Register, admitted that the corrupt officials were all Democrats only in response to reader complaints about the peculiar omission.

Lots of news stories on the scandal in Bell used the word "Democrat" or "Democratic." But that was only to say that the DEMOCRATIC attorney general of California, Jerry Brown, who is running on the DEMOCRATIC ticket for governor, is investigating the Bell officials' salaries.

So we know the media are aware of party affiliations. They just chose not to mention it when it would require them to identify shockingly corrupt government officials as Democrats.

Any day now, the media will start describing Maxine Waters as "the light-skinned congresswoman from California."

(But you might want to vote for that DEMOCRATIC attorney general who is apparently a great crusader against corruption ... despite his years of ignoring the public employee salary and pension looting that has driven the state into insolvency.)

Maybe Obama's Czar of City Managers' Salaries could investigate this.

Unlike political corruption involving sex or bribery, the outrage in Bell isn't a scandal that hits both parties from time to time -- it's how the Democrats govern.

Elected Democratic officials bestow ludicrous salaries and benefits packages on government employees, and, in return, public employee unions make sure the Democrats keep getting re-elected.

The scandal in Bell isn't a scandal at all for the Democrats. Au contraire! This is the governing strategy of the Democratic Party.

27 October 2008

GOVERNOR PALIN'S WARDROBE

Strange title, isn't it? Well, if you think that's strange, this is one of the lastest snatching-at-straws attack on Governor Palin from the left. I'm sure that you have heard about it. The supposed issue was the REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE spending $150,000 for Governor Palin's clothing, hair styling, and accesories. Before I go any further, to show how biased the media is in this country, and has been since my childhood (which is forty years worth for me - believe it or not "slanting" of news stories was actually taught in the Clarke County, Georgia school system - betcha won't hear it now!!!!), has Senator Obama and Senator Biden been questioned or scrutinized anywhere near to the extent Senator McCain and Governor Palin have? Absolutely not. And you won't.

Here is an excerpt from an ASSOCIATED PRESS news story by Brendan Farrington dated October 24, 2008. The article, MCCAIN HAS TERSE RESPONSE ON PALIN SHOPPING SPREE, reported Senator McCain being asked several questions by a report in Ormond Beach, Florida.

"McCain was asked several questions on Thursday about the shopping spree -- and he answered each one more or less the same way: Palin needed clothes and they'll be donated to charity.

"She needed clothes at the time. They'll be donated at end of this campaign. They'll be donated to charity," McCain told reporters on his campaign bus between Florida rallies.

"Asked for details on how they'll be donated, McCain said, "It works by her getting some clothes when she was made the nominee of the party and it will be donated back to charity."

Apparently, as is usual for liberal media, someone kept asking the same thing over and over. Senator McCain finally had to put it in even plainer English: It works like this: when she was nominated for the Vice-Presidential candidate, clothing was purchased. It will be donated back to charity when the campaign is over.

What the media was trying to do, and never got that far, was to allege Federal law violations. Federal law prohibits anything purchased by a political party from being converted to personal use. My personal opinion is that one of the reasons the media attempted this was because there is more and more information coming out about numerous campaign finance violations by the Obama campaign.

In an article on NEWSMAX.COM by Kenneth R. Timmerman, an investigation of Senator Obama's campaign finance records indicate donations from Bart Simpson, Family Guy, Daffy Duck, and King Kong as well as a number of individual donations that exceed the $2,300 limit. One of the most blatant examples is a donor who first used the name O. J. Simpson on October 14th giving the employer name of "State of Nevada" and listing the occupation as "convict, donated five dollars through Senator Obama's website." Four minutes earlier, using the same credit card, a donor listed as Raela Odinga made a donation listing an address of "2007 Stolen Election Passage" in "Nairobi, Kentucky." First, Raela Odinga is the Prime Minister of Kenya, and it's seriously doubtful this was the real Prime Minister Odinga making this donation. Anything's possible, I guess, but doubtful. Second, no one in the Obama campaign caught this. Interesting thing about Prime Minister Odinga - he claims to be Senator Obama's cousin through a maternal uncle. Here's a link to the entire article:

http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/obama_illegal_donations/2008/10/21/142761.html

There are enough campaign finance violations that the Republican National Committee filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission on October 6, 2008.

ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, where are you on this? If Senator Obama were a Republican, all of you and every liberal newspaper in the country would have been running and re-running this twenty-fours a day ad nauseum.

It will be interesting to see just how the FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION handles this, that is, if they do at all.



Photobucket